Buffalo Skyline from BCT 800x135

Monday June 23, 2008 at 14:06

Gentrification is fun again!

Monday June 02, 2008 at 14:03

“For my money, the “we were lied to” chorus only represents the obdurately self-righteous cluelessness in every band of the American political spectrum.”

We lied to ourselves. We continue to lie to ourselves every day. The US public barely understands the first thing about the energy predicament we’re in, and what it means for how we live in this country — or how we get along with the rest of the world — and the news media tragically reflects that ignorance. We fantasize about being “energy independent” and still being able to drive to the mall three times a day to eat caesar salads grown on the other side of North America. Get this: we deserve exactly what is happening to us. We might as well keep on lying to ourselves to pretend that we are not descending into a dark phase of our own history. After all, the true basis of American life these days is to feel good about yourself no matter what you do. 

- Jim Kunstler (via azspot)

Great quote. I’m finishing up his classic book The Geography of Nowhere as I write this.

This post was reblogged from ☼ AZspot ☼.

Thursday May 22, 2008 at 13:46

The New York Times has a number of interesting pieces on the price of gas. To quote the times, an “Oracle” at Goldman Sachs predicts oil will reach $150 to $200 over the next 6 to 24 months. Ford is cutting production. Coal production is increasing. Oh, and Krugman is calling for the end of the American Dream, or of Suburbia at least.
I would imagine the newspapers looked similar during the oil embargo, but I’m hopeful that this time the price pressure from oil will lead to more meaningful long term changes.

The New York Times has a number of interesting pieces on the price of gas. To quote the times, an “Oracle” at Goldman Sachs predicts oil will reach $150 to $200 over the next 6 to 24 months. Ford is cutting production. Coal production is increasing. Oh, and Krugman is calling for the end of the American Dream, or of Suburbia at least.

I would imagine the newspapers looked similar during the oil embargo, but I’m hopeful that this time the price pressure from oil will lead to more meaningful long term changes.

Wednesday May 21, 2008 at 16:44

"High gas prices are making more people than ever choose public transit"

 has been a common headline these past few weeks and months, although it isn’t really true. It’s only more people than have ridden in recent memory, and even then it’s only around a 5-10% increase in ridership, and even then only about 5% of Americans use public transit. I would assume that more people would choose to take transit if there were better transit options.

This leads to the problem of needing massive investment in infrastructure, which would require a few things:

1. a permanent shift in how Americans view transit.

2. a new dedicated funding stream for transit (say a substantially increased gas tax dedicated to transit similar to how Europe operates, or some other system more palatable to Americans, and this of course assumes point 1.)

3. More cities and urban cores would need to become much denser to make light and medium rail economically feasible.

During the turn of the 20th century when Boston, New York, and Chicago built their subway systems many other smaller, but still relatively dense, cities wanted to build their own as well but costs at the time were prohibitive, and now that cities are built up I would imagine getting the right of ways for streetcars alone would make most of these projects a non-starter.

So what will be the answer? What will the price of gas have to be before Americans choose to fund transit?  

If you don’t tumbl and would like to respond/comment email me and I’ll post it. matt . dudek (a) gmail . com 

Sunday May 18, 2008 at 11:08

This reminds me of Robin Rhode’s work as well, although he tends to incorporate people interacting with his drawings. 

Street art is one of those things I love about cities. For those in the Boston area, the ICA has a great exhibit called “Street Level” on loan from the Duke’s Nasher Museum that features the work of Robin Rhode, William Cordova, and Mark Bradford.

Blublu.org

theron:

very rad.

This post was reblogged from Theron humphrey.

Sunday May 18, 2008 at 10:43

Well here’s a ridiculously bad idea. Chrysler is offering a deal that if you buy one of their vehicles, they will give you a gas card that locks in the price of gas at $2.99/gallon. (Chrysler will reimburse you the difference). This gives the buyer the perverse incentive of buying the least fuel efficient automobile so they can save the most money.
This will artificially inflate the price of gas by raising demand and, does nothing to address the problem of our dependence on oil and the preposterously bad average fuel efficiency. It would seem that the gas price situation must be pretty bleak if Chrysler is willing to offer an incentive like this.
Chrysler: via: the Boston Globe
UPDATE: Food in Mouth correctly reblogs me and says that the #4  American auto maker probably won’t have that large of an effect on changing demand for oil and therefore the price of oil. This is more than likely correct, Chrysler alone probably won’t be able to do this, but if other car companies begin to offer similar incentives, etc. etc. And either way, Chrysler is creating an artificially low price which as we all know from Econ 101 will have higher demand at that lower price.
And Food in Mouth also believes that potential car buyers will do the math and see that they don’t stand to save much money based on this deal. I hope he’s correct, but I am less optimistic. Kenneth Galbraith coined the term “conventional wisdom” and by it he meant that anyone could choose to believe what they want to believe within a reasonable range and have evidence or theorists that would back them up. (From his book The Affluent Society). I’ve found in my conversations with family living in the suburbs and those that are automobile dependent, they choose to believe that the high prices are due to a constrained supply. So if you choose to believe that, then buying a Chrysler now that get’s 12mpg  makes sense with a locked in gas price and the likeliehood of gas prices falling sub $3/gallon in the near future.
Which brings me to my original point, this does nothing to address the oil dependency problem. (Food in Mouth, thanks for continuing the discussion)

Well here’s a ridiculously bad idea. Chrysler is offering a deal that if you buy one of their vehicles, they will give you a gas card that locks in the price of gas at $2.99/gallon. (Chrysler will reimburse you the difference). This gives the buyer the perverse incentive of buying the least fuel efficient automobile so they can save the most money.

This will artificially inflate the price of gas by raising demand and, does nothing to address the problem of our dependence on oil and the preposterously bad average fuel efficiency. It would seem that the gas price situation must be pretty bleak if Chrysler is willing to offer an incentive like this.

Chrysler: via: the Boston Globe

UPDATE: Food in Mouth correctly reblogs me and says that the #4  American auto maker probably won’t have that large of an effect on changing demand for oil and therefore the price of oil. This is more than likely correct, Chrysler alone probably won’t be able to do this, but if other car companies begin to offer similar incentives, etc. etc. And either way, Chrysler is creating an artificially low price which as we all know from Econ 101 will have higher demand at that lower price.

And Food in Mouth also believes that potential car buyers will do the math and see that they don’t stand to save much money based on this deal. I hope he’s correct, but I am less optimistic. Kenneth Galbraith coined the term “conventional wisdom” and by it he meant that anyone could choose to believe what they want to believe within a reasonable range and have evidence or theorists that would back them up. (From his book The Affluent Society). I’ve found in my conversations with family living in the suburbs and those that are automobile dependent, they choose to believe that the high prices are due to a constrained supply. So if you choose to believe that, then buying a Chrysler now that get’s 12mpg  makes sense with a locked in gas price and the likeliehood of gas prices falling sub $3/gallon in the near future.

Which brings me to my original point, this does nothing to address the oil dependency problem. (Food in Mouth, thanks for continuing the discussion)

Friday May 16, 2008 at 16:07

Boston’s Old City Hall. I pass this everyday. I love this building.
Boston’s Old City Hall. I pass this everyday. I love this building.

Wednesday May 07, 2008 at 14:46

I’ve been thinking my tumblr has been a bit too text heavy lately and my SO, Jessie Gladin-Kramer, is an amazing photographer, so I thought I could kill two birds with one stone (not that I’d ever actually kill a bird) by posting some of her urban photographs here.
umbrellalove.blogspot.com
JGK Photography

I’ve been thinking my tumblr has been a bit too text heavy lately and my SO, Jessie Gladin-Kramer, is an amazing photographer, so I thought I could kill two birds with one stone (not that I’d ever actually kill a bird) by posting some of her urban photographs here.

umbrellalove.blogspot.com

JGK Photography

Monday May 05, 2008 at 17:53

“The irony is with the gas prices what they are, we should be expanding rail service.”

Barack Obama

During an informal lunch. Read more of the conversation at Gristmill

Monday May 05, 2008 at 16:54

“Companies are big on breaking the car addiction because doing so raises productivity, amps morale, and delivers much lusted-after green cred.”

Suddenly it’s cool to take the bus, Business Week

Looks like Business Week did an entire issue on how the price of oil may change and has changed the way we live. Check out the articles on how the price of gas might effect our car culture, and where we live

The above quote is from an article on the increase use of employer sponsored transit systems with every increase in the cost of gas. For the short time that I dealt with an hour commute each way by car, I always felt completely drained by the time I got home. I quickly decided that the extra cost of rent in the city was well worth my time and sanity, but it’s interesting to see that some businesses went to the trouble of quantifying that happiness. 

Page 1 of 8